Monthly Archives: January 2026

Radical Skepticism Rejects Biblical Evidence Using The Spider-Man Fallacy

Ancient Assyrian shard was part of a seal used to authenticate ancient documents and letters. Emil Aladjem/Israel Antiquities Authority

When a recent archaeological discovery in Jerusalem—an Assyrian administrative inscription corroborating the biblical account of Sennacherib’s invasion—hit social media, skeptics responded not with historical analysis but with comic book analogies. “Spider-Man mentions New York,” one skeptic argued, implying that real places in fiction mean nothing, proving anything. This absurd comparison reveals something troubling about modern…

Is the Bible Sexist? An Honest Look at Difficult Passages About Women

Is the Bible sexist?

Understanding Biblical Passages About Women It’s a question that deserves an honest answer: Is the Bible sexist? For many people, both skeptics and believers, certain biblical passages about women are deeply troubling at face value. Commands for wives to “submit,” restrictions on women teaching, laws that seem to treat women as property, and stories of…

Is the Gospel of John Historical? Part 3: Dating Evidence and Answering Challenges

Historic reliability of the Gospel of John

In Parts 1 and 2, we examined the manuscript evidence, early church testimony, and archaeological discoveries that establish John’s Gospel as historically reliable. But significant scholarly challenges remain: When was John written? How do we reconcile apparent contradictions with the Synoptic Gospels? Can theological interpretation coexist with historical reporting? This final installment addresses these critical…

Is the Gospel of John Historical? Part 2: Archaeological Evidence

The Pool of Bethesda vindicates the Gospel of John

In Part 1, we examined the manuscript evidence and early church testimony establishing John’s Gospel as an authentic first-century document. But skeptics have long argued that even if John was written early, it still represents theological fiction rather than historical reporting. They pointed to specific geographical and architectural details as “proof” that John invented stories…

Is the Gospel of John Historical? Part 1: John’s Authorship and Manuscript Evidence

Gospel of John Authorship and Manuscript Evidence

Research across early church testimony, manuscript evidence, archaeology, and critical scholarship converges to demonstrate that the Gospel of John represents historically grounded eyewitness testimony, validating John as the author of the Gospel about Jesus of Nazareth. While the Fourth Gospel has faced intense skepticism since the 19th century—dismissed as late theological fiction disconnected from historical…